Useful feedback on an AI short film identifies a particular moment, explains how you experienced it, and leaves the filmmaker with a clear question to investigate. “The visuals are impressive” may be encouraging, but it gives a creator little information about whether the story reached you.

With Rome AI Festival listed for 19 September 2026, this is a useful time to think about the conversations that follow a screening. The date appears on both the festival website and VIA’s official event page. The method below is our editorial suggestion for discussing work; it is not a judging system or a promised festival activity.

Establish what kind of response is welcome

A private review of a rough cut and a conversation after a finished film call for different responses. Before giving detailed notes, find out whether the filmmaker is looking for an overall reaction, help with one scene, or a discussion of the finished work. Someone sharing a completed film may welcome questions without wanting an unsolicited list of changes.

For work in progress, ask what can still change. Temporary sound, placeholder images and an unfinished ending need context. Sundance Collab’s Workshop Your Work guidance encourages creators to state their stage of development and ask specific questions so they can receive more targeted feedback.

If you are the filmmaker, give your viewer a manageable request: “I want to know when you understand why she returns to the room.” That question gives you more useful evidence than asking whether the whole film is good.

Record your first experience before diagnosing it

Watch once without trying to solve the film. Afterwards, note what you thought was happening, which moment held your attention and where your understanding changed. In a cinema, wait until the screening ends rather than lighting up your phone to write through it.

Keep uncertainty in your notes. “I thought these scenes happened on different days” is a useful report of your experience. It does not yet establish that the edit is wrong. The filmmaker may have intended a time jump, or may need to reconsider the cues that led you there.

If a second viewing is available, use it to locate the moment behind your response. Check whether the confusion began with an image, a line, a sound or the order of two shots. You can then discuss a specific part of the film without pretending your first interpretation was universal.

Use a three-part note: moment, response, question

Imagine a short film in which a woman hears a bell, looks toward a corridor and closes a door. An example note could be:

  • Moment: the cut from her reaction to the empty corridor.
  • Response: I assumed someone had left, so I read the door closing as disappointment.
  • Question: did you want us to expect another person, or understand that she is alone?

This is an invented scene and example response. Its purpose is to show how a note can connect an observable moment to a personal interpretation. It gives the filmmaker something to assess before anyone suggests a new shot or a different ending.

Use the same structure for what works. “The bell continues over the empty corridor, and that kept me waiting for an arrival” identifies a choice worth preserving. Specific positive notes help a creator avoid removing an effective detail while repairing something else.

If you want to suggest a solution, present it as a test: “Would it be useful to compare a version that holds on her face longer?” A test invites comparison. It leaves room for the filmmaker to find a different way of answering the same question.

Describe AI-related distractions without guessing the process

AI-generated imagery can invite discussion about how a shot was made. Keep what you observed separate from your explanation of its cause. A changing prop shape is visible; which model produced it, how many attempts it took and whether the filmmaker intended the change may be unknown.

For example: “The cup changes shape during the close-up, and I stopped following the conversation to look at it.” That tells the filmmaker where your attention went. They can decide whether the change supports the scene or needs attention. Calling the entire film “broken AI” would discard the useful detail.

For a repeated visual mismatch, our visual continuity guide offers a way to inspect neighboring shots. For a sound that obscures an important action or line, the sound-design workflow suggests a separate listening pass. These are possible follow-up tools, not automatic diagnoses.

Turn a pile of comments into one editing experiment

When receiving feedback, write down the point of confusion before defending your intention. You can clarify the story afterwards, but first capture what the viewer understood without that explanation. An explanation given in conversation does not tell you whether the film itself communicated the same information.

Look for recurring observations while retaining differences between viewers. If several people misunderstand the same transition, inspect it. If they propose incompatible solutions, you can still use their shared observation without attempting to satisfy every suggestion.

Choose one question for the next edit. Make a reversible change, save it as a separate version and compare the relevant sequence. Ask a fresh viewer what they understand without first telling them which answer you want. Decide whether the change serves your film rather than treating the notes as a vote.

Keep public questions short and grounded in the film

If an event offers audience questions, ask about a decision you can point to. You could ask why a scene stays on an empty space, how the filmmaker selected the final sound, or which moment changed most during editing. Choose one question and give the speaker room to answer it.

A public question is not the same as a private feedback session. Follow the host’s format, avoid narrating your entire alternative film, and do not assume a creator wants to discuss every production detail. Check each event’s published programme rather than assuming a particular Q&A will take place.

Bring the habit from the screening to the next project

For a compact feedback exchange, write just four lines after watching: what I understood, the moment I remember, where I became uncertain, and one question. Then let the filmmaker identify which note would be useful to explore.

VIA’s Rome AI Festival page provides the current programme and booking links. For a later opportunity to make work, the Prompt2Screen registration page lists 10 October 2026 at Blox Space in Torino. Check the official pages for access arrangements. A precise conversation about a film can become a small, practical experiment in your next one.

Sources & further reading

Updated 18 September 2026. Event availability and final details are maintained on the linked official event pages.

Your next scene starts here.

Join the creators and the audience at Prompt2Screen Torino.

Find your pass ↗